To: | amps@contesting.com (Amps) |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] QSK |
From: | jkearman@att.net (Jim Kearman) |
Date: | Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:27:19 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
From: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net> > > Gents, don't you think this QSK thing has run its course? Some discussion on PIN QSK switches and the life expectancy of vacuum relays that track dots and dashes would be useful and on-topic. How are people who homebrew high-power HF amps handling this? In closing, let me say that the only way to go in a CW pileup is with a memory keyer. Mash the button and send your call without error. Mash another button and send the exchange without error (assuming you get through). The reduction in stress is priceless. 73, Jim, KR1S http://kr1s.kearman.com/ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] QSK, Jim Tonne |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] Filter capacitor values, HAROLD B MANDEL |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] QSK, Roy Koeppe |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] QSK, Joe Isabella |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |