Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] TL922 Power Plugs

To: "'Paul Christensen'" <w9ac@arrl.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] TL922 Power Plugs
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:48:53 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Paul Christensen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:00 AM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] TL922 Power Plugs
> 
> > If I am following what you are saying that is not correct. Under the old
> > rules with a 3 wire feeder to a detached building the neutral was to be
> > connected to the neutral and ground buss in the panel in the remote
> > building. A local ground rod was also to be installed and connected to
> the
> > neutral/ground buss at the detached building.
> 
> Gary,
> 
> Pre-2008 NEC, that's allowable as long as there is no other metallic path
> between structures.  It still appears to be an allowable exception on some
> existing wiring with conditions.  Myself, I would convert the path between
> structures to 4-wire if reasonably possible.
> 
> Paul, W9AC

Agreed Paul.
However that part of the code seems to be kind of a farce as you have a
similar condition if you live in a city with houses side by side. Several
houses may be fed from the same pole transformer each with 3 wire feeds.
There are also gas lines, water lines, cable TV, phone lines etc. that have
common connections between houses that can provide alternate neutral paths.
Oh well, they are trying.

73
Gary  K4FMX

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>