| To: | Amps group <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:17:02 +0000 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped) On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:37:18 +0000, Ch wrote: >Gee, I saw ligo and, due to context, saw LEGO. Huummmm. > >Ch REPLY: Bartender, I'll have whatever he's having, but not so strong. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Bob Moody |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Bill Turner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Charles H |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Charles H |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |