| To: | Amps group <amps@contesting.com>, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K |
| From: | Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> |
| Reply-to: | Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:45:13 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote: > It's only drawback is it won't do legal limit on RTTY or other continuous > carrier mode. Very few amps will run legal limit on 100% duty cycle RTTY! I don't think I'd want to pay for the power supply that would need. 73, Cathy N5WVR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K, Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K, Jim W7RY |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K, Bill Turner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] A cheer for the SPE 2K, Jim W7RY |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |