Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Stock up on tubes?

To: Amps group <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Stock up on tubes?
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:41:04 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 06:13:07 -0600, you wrote:

>Ok but some of us are about on our last go-round. What do we do for our 
>thousands of SB 2nn series Heath amps??
>73
>K5DAM

REPLY:

If it were my SB 2xx amp I would replace the 3-500(s) with a single
8877. It is a smaller tube so it should fit OK, and a single 8877 has
more power capability than a pair of 3-500's and needs only about half
the drive for the same output. The filament voltage is the same and
filament current is less, so no change is needed there. 

I have never actually done this so there might be a gotcha I'm not
aware of and you would need to proceed carefully, but if successful
you would have a much better amp. More headroom, better reliability,
less drive and in most cases an 8877 does not need a parasitic
suppressor. My homebrew 8877 amp does not have one and is perfectly
stable on all bands. I have seen numerous other 8877 designs that do
not have one either. 

Making a change like this is not for the inexperienced and if you are
unsure about it, you should probably find an Elmer to help you. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>