| To: | Fern Rivard <crc@cyberlink.ca> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] triode vs tetrode |
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Dec 2016 19:04:24 -0600 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
If that's the amp design I'm thinking about (4CX250B), it's a terrible design. It was notorious for splatter and distortion. With 813s, maybe it was OK. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Fern Rivard <crc@cyberlink.ca> wrote: > A better way yet is to go G2DAF > _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] triode vs tetrode, Fern Rivard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Stock up on tubes?, Catherine James |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] triode vs tetrode, Fern Rivard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] triode vs tetrode, Ian White |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |