Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] IMD vs CW BW.

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] IMD vs CW BW.
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:45:50 -0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Here's a pdf file collecting a lot of measurements I've made on the rigs and amps I could easily get to measure. http://k9yc.com/P3_Spectrum_Measurements.pdf

Remember that what we call CW is really 100% amplitude modulation of a carrier by a rectangular wave. The rise and fall time have an infinite spectrum, and the components excite intermod. Slide 8 is a steady carrier with no keying. The sidebands at -70dBC are 60 Hz hum. Slide 11 is the same for an FTDX5000.

Slide 14 and many that follow are a series of dits at about 30 wpm. The stuff below about 55 dB is IMD.

Slide 63 shows an amp that is adding IMD to a CW signal. Yes, the sidebands are clicks. Slides 70-72 compare that amp to the Titan and the KPA500 at their rated power.

On all of these rigs and amps, the differences are more than -40dBC. That matters when the broad signal is very strong and the bands are full. Like in a contest. :) I see lots of signals that are 20-30 dB over S9, so their -50 dBC sidebands can wipe out a lot of signals I want to work. And when one of these broad radios shows up next to my running frequency, either he has to more or I do, because I can't hear half the guys calling me.

The K3 keying is carefully shaped to provide clear keying at QRQ (up to 100 wpm). If I remember correctly, they're using a raised cosine function to shape it. Isn't DSP wonderful? Last I've heard, the better (later) firmware for some SDR radios is doing the same thing or something similar.

Most other rigs give the user a menu setting that allows them to vary rise and fall time; clicks increase with faster rise and fall times. Below about 35 wpm, bandwidth is independent of keying speed and depends only on the keying waveform; above that speed, information theory takes over, and the higher speed causes bandwidth to increase. I don't work faster than about 35 wpm myself, but some of the QRQ guys on 40M are running WAY up there, mostly with keyboards, I think.

Not all of the broadness is clicks -- on the worst radios, some of the really broad stuff is phase noise. That's the "whooshing" noise that we hear corresponding to keying. BTW -- that Mark V Field had been "fixed."

K6XX has a big station about 3 miles from me on top of the ridge that I have get over to get to EU. We both run K3s and tube amps. Because we keep our signals as clean as possible, we can work 500 Hz apart on CW, often not knowing the other is there.

73, Jim K9YC

On Fri,12/30/2016 8:34 PM, Jim Thomson wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 01:27:49 -0800
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] FCC Denies Expert Linears' Request for Waiver of
15 dBRule

The IMD from this amp is significantly higher than my "good" amps, so
I'll eventually replace it, because I can't use it for contesting
(because the IMD makes it broad on CW). The Titan remains my contesting
amp, clean as the K3 that drives it at legal limit. But the SPE gives me
3 dB more than my KPA500 on 6M (and instant on at HF), which is why it's
on my operating desk. :)

Glen says the 1.3K he bought is close to 14-15 dB gain, but that the
vendor offered to tell him how to get the additional available gain. It
would, indeed, be nice if SPE used the additional gain to reduce IMD.
But the DXpeditioners love the 1.3K-FA -- it's light weight (thanks to
an SMPS), very close to legal limit. And when you're DX in the middle of
nowhere, you don't have neighbors who care if you're a bit broad. :)

73, Jim K9YC

##  Im trying to wrap my head around  poor  IMD  vs being broad on CW mode.
Im assuming a clean CW signal  from the xcvr.... driving an amp with mediocre
IMD.   Exactly what effect are you seeing.   Does it sound like key clicks.
How much broader are you talking about, several hundred hz or what.

Jim   VE7RF


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>