| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] busted Q's |
|---|---|
| From: | sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington) |
| Date: | Thu May 6 12:07:26 1999 |
I'll cast another vote in FAVOR of log checking. The important thing is that we all play by the same rules, and we know what they are. That's sure a lot better than wondering if you're penalizing yourself by deleting a questionalble multiplier, when your competitors may be leaving them in. Scott K9MA -- Scott Ellington sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu Madison, Wisconsin USA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] time for a massage?, Jon Ogden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Busted calls, Scott Ellington |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] busted Q's, n6tr@teleport.com |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Apr wpx and busted q--Font with slashed zero?, W. Wright, W5XD |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |