| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional? |
|---|---|
| From: | n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith) |
| Date: | Mon Nov 25 17:07:38 2002 |
At 05:06 PM 11/25/02 -0400, Mike Gilmer, N2MG wrote: >I use, albeit infrequently, the zone as sort of a >checksum on the prefix - it has saved my butt a few times) My favorite supporting anecdote this past weekend was logging a very weak VE2PAI, copying zone 22, and realizing what I had done. Thanks, Pai, for an unexpected pleasure. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Mike Gilmer, N2MG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] lousy contest calls, Pete Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Mike Gilmer, N2MG |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Jim Reisert AD1C |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |