| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] publcizing reports of assumed, suspected statiions with bad sigs.. |
|---|---|
| From: | w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ) |
| Date: | Fri Dec 13 10:17:32 2002 |
On 13 Dec 2002 at 5:10, KØHB wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
>
> >
> > There are very few legitimate contesters who actually want to have
> > bad signals.
> >
>
> Actually, there are *NO* legitimate contesters who actually want to
> have bad signals.
>
> I guarantee it!
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
Hope you honor that guarantee!
There are some signals that seem to develop just a little bit of
ripple, or some other distinguishing characteristic, only during
contests. I'll be it IS intentional, to stand out in the crowd.
Barry--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] publcizing reports of 'assumed, suspected' statiions with bad sigs.., Michael Tope |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Key clicks improved on the Mark-V FIELD?, Tracy, Michael, KC1SX |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] publcizing reports of assumed, suspected statiions with bad sigs.., KØHB |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] TIME OUT ? ARRL10m, Lu3hy Juan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |