| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] serious question |
|---|---|
| From: | k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville) |
| Date: | Thu Jan 16 05:19:55 2003 |
al_lorona@agilent.com wrote: ""I thought it was never acceptable to edit the log after the contest was over?" Webster's: edit = to alter, adapt, or refine especially to bring about conformity to a standard or to suit a particular purpose Contest sponsors: edit = correcting typo's Surely you wouldn't expect anyone to use "edit", when "correcting typo's" is so conveniently available? C'Ya, Shelby |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] MNQP -- February 1st, KØHB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQ160 Rule Changes in 2003 - Multi-Op Time Limit - Summary and Recommendation, Milt Jensen, N5IA |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] serious question, al_lorona@agilent.com |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] NAQP - it IS.. de K7BV, K7bv@aol.com |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |