| To: | K3FT <k3ft@starpower.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation |
| From: | Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 May 2004 22:23:28 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|
On May 20, 2004, at 6:54 PM, K3FT wrote: Why is THAT acceptable for MORE important things while the ARRL requires Hypothetical situation: E-mail Slim. Say you have a guy that manages to obtain, or can forge the e-mail address of a DX country -- perhaps P5? 1S? Something like that. He decides he wants to create confirmations for himself and his buddies. So, he uses e-mail to obtain a certificate, then uploads logs for the "QSOs" he wants to generate credit. Next then you know, he and his buddies are on the "honor roll." The ARRL has a really difficult past with regard to Slims. I can see why they would want to be extra careful with the LotW. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation, Joe Subich, K4IK |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation, Igor Sokolov |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation, Joe Subich, K4IK |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation, Noel Walsh Ei2JC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |