| To: | "'ak0a'" <ak0a@kc.rr.com>, <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>,"'i4jmy'" <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again |
| From: | "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com> |
| Reply-to: | barry@mxg.com |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:05:48 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Since the 3830 report form has a check box for SO2R, if the summary posting would just flag those that are SO2R, we'd see if there really is a clear separation of scores, and maybe put an end to the issue of whether another category is needed. 73 Barry, W5GN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] INRAD Roofing filter impressions after CQ WW CWcontest, Peter Chamalian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Joe Subich, K4IK |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, George Fremin III |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again, Tom Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |