| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category |
| From: | n4gi@tampabay.rr.com |
| Reply-to: | n4gi@tampabay.rr.com |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:52:44 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message ----- From: Russell Hill <rustyhill@earthlink.net> > I believe that if we had a category which limited antenna height > to 50 feet > or so, and we honored those who do well with that limitation, we > might > encourage the little pistol to improve his station and make a > serious > attempt to place well in the low antenna category. My (one) city lot tower is 55 feet tall. I'll have to get some dirt and make a 5' high mound around the base. 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 23, Issue 86, Eddie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category, Richard Detweiler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category, Russell Hill |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category, Richard DiDonna NN3W |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |