| To: | <py8azt@amazon.com.br>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Physical conditioning and contesting |
| From: | "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:43:07 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|
Good Morning, Luc-- this is from Rusty, na5tr, who started the thread about
antenna height. Fundamentally, I agree with you. With my antenna height, I would not be in the category I have suggested. We have a problem here in the U.S. More and more people are forced by economics and availability of housing to live in areas where antennas are very limited, even though in many cases the houses are quite expensive, nice houses. Basically, almost all new houses for the past 30 or so years have been built in subdivisions with deed restrictions which severely limit antenna height, or these days prohibit external antennas entirely. There are fewer and fewer amateurs who are able to own a house where they can legally put up a decent antenna, while more and more amateurs are legally prevented from putting up good antennas. At the same time more and more communities are passing laws which limit antennas. (This is legal here in the U.S.) If an amateur wishes to put up a large or even decent sized antenna, he needs buy a piece of land out in the county, not in a subdivision, and build a house, or live in an older part of a city where there are no deed restrictions because the houses were all built before deed restrictions became popular. If he wishes to buy a house less than 30 years old, and live in a neighbrhood near schools and stores, then he will only be able to buy a house with deed restrictions preventing good antennas. I have a place in the country with a nice house. I have a 72 ft crankup with a 20 ft mast on top. (That is not a big tower, but it suits my needs.) I have the option of putting up a bigger tower, and more antennas. Most amateurs do not. I am concerned that the number of serious contesters will decline. The statistics say the average age of amateurs in the U.S. is getting older. The percentage of U.S. citizens who are active amateurs is declining. I believe that having a category for amateurs who cannot have good antennas will perhaps keep some in the hobby who would otherwise walk away. I would hate to see contesting die out due to lack of participation. QRP, LP and HP categories are all well and good, but if the only thing a guy can put up is an "invisible" dipole at 30 ft, no matter how good an operator he is, he is simply at a big handicap. Thanks for reading this, Luc. I have tried to give you some insight as to the thinking behind the idea of a limited height category. 73, Rusty ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luc, PY8AZT" <py8azt@amazon.com.br> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com> Cc: <daven2nl@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:15 AM Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Physical conditioning and contesting Hi Dave et al, First, congrats about take care about your health. Over weight is the most cause of death in world. I did this same way early 2003. Now, I eliminated 23kg (~50 pounds), just by changing my lifestyle, eating and working out about 4 hours/week. Before, be awake was my strongest obstacle during contest. On the 2003 CQWW CW, it was first time I ran full 48hs, ending up over 2k5 QSOs SOAB LP (I have modest station: 3 elements triband, wires for low bands and 100W Rig). After contest, I keep excited and cannot sleep. So, I went to computer to write up an article about CQWW. I moved to the bad after 65 hours since friday morning. The benefits of weight loss are beyond health and for sure give advantages on 48h contests, like CQWW. So, some body could sugest split fat and slim Op's category...hi hi hi Finals, who want be competitive needs to invest in whatever (i.e. antennas, radios, skills, SO2R, even health - respecting ALL and SAME rules) to take advantages over crowd - not asking for new category or changing rules. In MHO, sound ridiculous change rules to benefit who didn't move on toward to be competitive. Who want win needs to outstand the crowd by working hard to master code, know HF propagation, handle pileup, be awake, antennas, SO2R, and strategy! By the way, thanks for all QSOs on the CQWW CW. I was ZZ8Z (SOSB20m LP), ended up with 1400 Qs, 117 Cty, 35 Zn and 650k pts after 35h operating time. Best 73, Luc, PY8AZT
-- Member: LABRE / ARRL / CWJF / Uirapuru DX Club Home Phone: +55 (91) 276-5383 Cell Phone: +55 (91) 8131-1010 Club Home Page: http://www.uirapuru.org DX Brasil Page: http://www.uirapuru.org/dxbrasil Entrar na Lista de Discussão CQ Contest: cq_contest-subscribe@topica.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Little Pistols,Big Guns, More entry classes, km9m-zig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Pistols,Big Guns, More entry classes, Bill Turner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Physical conditioning and contesting, Luc, PY8AZT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Physical conditioning and contesting, K4SB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |