Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Line Scores

["Yo3ctk" <yo3ctk@alltrom.ro>]

Well, my mistake: I was referring to the ARRL Field Day. Sorry for the 
mix-up, but all my comments stand: we CAN have 12 pages of QST for the Field 
Day (which isn't even a contest) but we CANNOT have some pages for major 
international contests sponsored by ARRL

73 de Mike, YO3CTK

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz@prairienet.org>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Line Scores


> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Yo3ctk wrote:
>
> > But, lo and behold, in December issue, no less than 12 (twelve) pages
> > dedicated to ARRL Field Day, 4 (four) pages for June VHF QSO Party (which
> > isn't even a contest) and 2 (two) pages for January 2005 contest
> > announcements (four contests of which three are domestic).
>
> We sure treat the June/September VHF QSO Parties like contests around
> here! Where does ARRL state these aren't contests?
>
> It's amazing how much some of us put into this hobby just for
> contesting (time, if nothing else).  A Rover or portable setup for VHF+
> is not trivial. When you get to the level of 9 bands, you've put a LOT of
> time and money into it.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest