| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules forHQ stnsinIARUcontest |
| From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:21:12 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
N2IC:
>There have been several more unintended consequence of having HQ stations:
>Instead of Europe being 5 Zone multipliers, it now has 5 Zones, and 20+
HQ country multipliers. For USA stations, IARU has just become another
East Coast-works-Europe QSO party, thanks to the availability of ~25 EU
mults on each band.
It was indeed possible to do well from
outside the East Coast. From Colorado, I believe
I finished second overall (to K1TO) a couple of
times in the late 80's. With the number of HQ mults
in EU now, I suspect it would be very difficult or
impossible to win from areas west.
73, Bill W4ZV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in IARU, Dave Lawley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW VHF Recap for a Dozen participants, David Robbins K1TTT |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Fw: Is it a time to change rules forHQstnsinIARUcontest, Braco OE1EMS |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in, Marijan Miletic |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |