| To: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net, Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>,CQ-Contest eMail Remailer <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation |
| From: | Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:04:13 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In Canada we already could use SSB down te 3.500 but we dont... Let's see what will happen now... ------------------------------------------ I think the changes to 80m are a disaster for everyone. FCC had a bad case of cranial/rectal inversion. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation, Jimk8mr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 Pa QSO Party Plans, Michael Coslo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation, Ed |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation, Jimk8mr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |