> I doubt anyone in San Diego would be so stupid as to send SD.
NOW NOW They already have sent ??6XXX for a call that should be the
answer after all
Quack
----- Original Message -----
From: "N6KI Dennis Vernacchia" <n6ki_73@sbcglobal.net>
To: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Cc: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG
> Any contestor, worth working, in San Diego, knows to send SDG
>
> Unless some real newbies showed up, I doubt anyone in San Diego
> would be so stupid as to send SD
>
> 73, Dennis N6KI
> Sandy Eggo
>
> RICHARD BOYD wrote:
>> I had a number of "sixes" send their section as SD. I automatically
>> converted that to SDG until I realized that one of the sixes I was
>> working probably was, I recalled, in South Dakota, so I logged it as SD,
>> which is what he sent. Now I wonder about those couple before that that
>> had send SD -- were they in South Dakota or in San Diego. Oh well. If I
>> lose a couple QSOs that won't kill me. In hindsight, I realize whenever
>> I hear SD sent and it's not a zero, and particularly if it's a six, I
>> have to ask for clarification, "SDG?"
>>
>> 73 - Rich, KE3Q
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.32/523 - Release Date: 11/7/2006
> 1:40 PM
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|