Re: [CQ-Contest] An Open Letter to Cabrillo Robot Authors [wasAnOpportunity for Cabrillo Improvement]

["Kevin J. Rowett" <kevin@rowett.org>]

> 
> If instead, the robot treated "QSO:" as a fixed length 
> record, all three "Cabrillo formatted" submissions above 
> could have been accepted because only data in the correct 
> columns would be used with the rest being discarded (though 
> that second one has me a little confused).
> 
> Robot authors, please seriously re-examine the way that QSO: 
> data is parsed.

Be conservative in what you send/emit, liberal in what you accept/parse.

73, -KR- K6TD (ex-WB6S)
 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest