USA percentage of all valid QSOs:
2006 - 4.9 percent
2007 - 6.6 percent
On an absolute basis and relative basis, the numbers were up. Significantly on
an absolute basis.
73 RIch NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW
> Rich, what are the relative percentages of your total QSOs for those years?
> Are you thinking the number is the result of specifying "outside the US"?
> I'm not sure I get what you're trying to say.
>
> Mark, N5OT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:47 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW
>
>
>> I'm not going to rehash old arguments and debates from the past, but
>> WB9Z's 3830 posting did spark a little question...
>>
>> Did anyone else besides him and I notice a marked increase in the number
>> of W/K stations answering domestic CQs this past weekend? My stateside
>> QSO count went from 152 in 2006 to 231 in 2007. And that 231 number is
>> the result of the fact that around 1900z I changed my CQ loop message to
>> "CQ countest outside of the United States?"
>>
>> Any other experiences on this matter?
>>
>> 73 Rich NN3W
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|