| To: | "4O3A" <yt6a@cg.yu>,"Bulletin Cq Contest (E-mail)" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW SSB spot analysis |
| From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:25:20 -0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
>
> But users are responsible to take care about caries frequency,
> and only CARRIER frequency is parameter defined in national band plans.
>
That's not accurate. The 'user' is responsible that all transmitted energy
is contained WITHIN the authorized band. In the USA, the rule is:
"§97.307 Emission standards.
.
.
(b) Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to
the band or segment available to the control operator.
73, de Hans, K0HB
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic stations in CQWW, Richard DiDonna NN3W |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW SSB spot analysis, Paul Cassel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Band edge operating - Previously "More CQWW SSBspot analysis", Peter Voelpel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW SSB spot analysis, Ward Silver |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |