| To: | CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category |
| From: | Jimk8mr@aol.com |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:56:56 EST |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 12/18/2007 11:49:41 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, on5zo@telenet.be writes: The point is IT'S THE ANTENNAS and LOCATION that make the difference in many cases. Not SO2R. Indeed. Maybe we need a new category for SO2T (single op - two towers). Or for SO2R1T. And SO1R2T. And SO2R3T. And . . . Go SORT it out. :>) 73 - Jim K8MR **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] K-3, Cqtestk4xs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Power consumptioin question for Alpha amps, Chris Tran GM3WOJ |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category, Igor Sokolov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category, ku8e |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |