| To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking |
| From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:13:54 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Jim wrote: > > One thing I know for sure, if the postings are delayed until the log > submission date, the activity will become of very low interest as the > "raison d'etre" for 3830 is the short term feedback on the scores and the > comments. > I have to agree with that. It is fun to read the feedback comments for the newest contest, but when postings are made that are 4 or 5 contests back, they are not as interesting. Looking at the results from friends efforts and what they have to say is what makes 3830 fun! I say leave it the way it is. If someone wants to cheat, they will figure a way. 73Tom W7WHY Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking, Dale Putnam |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another logging ethics query, Richard L. King |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking, Jim George |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking, Barry Merrill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |