No, not at all. Here is a little backround of what led up to this..
I am just a lowly WAS/VUCC checker, and I had a guy submit 23, or 28, can't
recall, printed EQSL's. I knew what they were, I knew we could not accept
them. So, the point I brought out was this, if a lowly WAS checker can spot
them,
should checker of the "Holy Grail" of awards also be knowledgeable enough to
spot them? Therefore, that is where my "sham" comments came from.
You should see some of the private emails I have been getting, it is like I
insulted allah in front of al-queda..
Amazing what some hams are capable of of, while sitting behind a keyboard,
well, really not amazing, but sad.
73-Chuck KI9A
In a message dated 3/4/2008 8:16:08 A.M. Central Standard Time, nn3w@cox.net
writes:
Does that make KI9A a perpetrator of fraud?
**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|