CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and 30 Hour Nonsense

To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and 30 Hour Nonsense
From: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Reply-to: Yuri VE3DZ <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:16:22 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ed, I guess - like in the real life - some people just want things to be
THEIR way.

73 Yuri  VE3DZ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and 30 Hour Nonsense


> So, I guess the NA Sprints should be extended to 48 hours by this
argument?
> Heck, why not a full 7-day week and we can see who the real contesters
are.
> Or, at least go back to the old ARRL DX Contest format of two 48-hour
> weekends.  Having 30-minute sprints, 4-hour sprints, 10-hour NAQPs, 24
hour
> Sweepstakes, 30 hour WPXs and lots of 48-hour contests is a wonderful
> diversity of competitions for our hobby.  Just like there are 100-yard
> dashes and marathons and everything in between.  And, no, the same
athletes
> don't win all these different formats.
>
> 73,
> Ed - W0YK
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>