| To: | CQ Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER |
| From: | Dave Lawley <dave@g4buo.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:38:36 +0100 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> ....... To deny those who > lack your particular skill set and dedication the ability > to participate in a significant portion of contests would > go a long way toward hastening the demise of contesting - > at least CW contesting. No, Joe. Turning it into just another datamode will hasten the demise of CW contesting. Dave G4BUO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Zack Widup |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Ken Claerbout |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate?, don . field |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER, David Robbins K1TTT |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |