| To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer |
| From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:33:05 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Dave said: >It doesn't simply make me more efficient ... it makes me unnecessary for > >that part of the activity. That is the sad part of it Dave. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation Reflector?, Paul Mackanos - K2DB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER, Larry Schimelpfenig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, David Gilbert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, K0HB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |