| To: | "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment |
| From: | "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:28:22 -0400 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Tod -ID <tod@k0to.us> wrote:
>
>
> I am puzzled by why my suggestion about leaving the categories as is and
> simply identifying everyone who used some form of Skimmer seems so
> underwhelming to folks.
Perhaps it's underwhelming because it doesn't address the primary
issue...is Skimmer Unassisted or Assisted? If I entered Unassisted (sans
Skimmer) but someone else who entered Unassisted (with Skimmer) had a higher
score, who will the sponsor say won the Unassisted category? Is that simple
enough?
73, Bill W4ZV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A), Bill Tippett |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment, Tod -ID |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment, aldewey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |