| To: | "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>, "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>, "cq-contesting cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge |
| From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:04:24 -0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > The definition/clarification needs to come from the > sponsors themselves. > > 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN Bob has cut through all the rhetoric and nailed the core issue. This cannot be decided in a "popularity contest". Each contest sponsor needs to make the decision based on their vision for the future direction of their contest. The buck stops with them. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment, K0HB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Martin Luther |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Stan Stockton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, VR2BrettGraham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |