| To: | Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Some thoughts on uniques, was: 99% of uniques are busted |
| From: | George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:27:33 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:50:28AM -0400, Pete Smith wrote: > > They don't seem to have done so this time at ARRL - I lost credit for every > unique (7 I think, not counting busted calls)), including at least 5 that > are confirmed to be active calls by QRZ. Just because it is a vaild issued callsign does not mean that it is not unique to a given log nor does it mean that the callsign was logged correctly. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] liars, cheats, and you, kr2q |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Some thoughts on uniques, was: 99% of, Pete Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Some thoughts on uniques, was: 99% of uniques are busted, Pete Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Some thoughts on uniques, was: 99% of uniques are busted, Michael Coslo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |