| To: | "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Re CW keying interfaces |
| From: | "Milt, N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:10:16 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
DITTO !!!!!!! de Milt, N5IA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com> To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:25 AM Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re CW keying interfaces > >I have never seen a need for optoisolators and >> never heard of a transistor failure in >> hundreds of interfaces I built. KISS! > Likewise, I've never had a transistorized keying interface fail in 20 > years > of using them. > Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND in one QSO?, Trottman Compound |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND in one QSO?, Paul J. Piercey |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Re CW keying interfaces, Mark Beckwith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Re CW keying interfaces, David Pruett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |