CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Another Year of SS Disections

To: "'Zack Widup'" <w9sz@prairienet.org>, "'K3MQ - Bob Johnson'" <k3mq@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Another Year of SS Disections
From: "Mike Fatchett W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:08:06 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Or add a couple of hundred to your number later in the contest?

This has been done in the past.  

 

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Zack Widup
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 4:34 PM
To: K3MQ - Bob Johnson
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Another Year of SS Disections

I was gonna start a new one. The rules specify a sequential serial number
but don't specify that you have to start with #1.  Why not start the contest
off with # 1100?

73, Zack W9SZ


On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, K3MQ - Bob Johnson wrote:

> Amen,  Ed.
>
> I really expected the "dead horse" this year to be the same as the 
> last few years (dare I say it) - the check year. Thank God for small 
> favors. Maybe the check issue got moved to its own reflector.
>
> C'mon guys, the rules are the rules. The same exchange has been used 
> for decades. Deal with it, and HAVE FUN!
>
> Bob - K3MQ
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>