| To: | "'CQ-Contest'" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New Universal Contest Rule XXII |
| From: | "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | K0HB <K0HB@ARRL.ORG> |
| Date: | Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:45:29 -0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
From: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com> > > However, all of these advances should be done "inside the > envelope" that is defined by the EXPLICIT ( <---K0HB emphasis) > rules ..... > Agreed. 100% agreed. On the other hand, however, I think that IMPLICIT rules ought be somewhat more open to "friendly challenge". 73, de Hans, K0HB http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/ Search my log at http://dx.qsl.net/cgi-bin/logform.cgi?k0hb _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] RA3CO, Tony Rogozinski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Oops....., Tony Rogozinski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New Universal Contest Rule XXII, Ed Muns |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New Universal Contest Rule XXII, Richard F DiDonna NN3W |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |