CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories

To: "Doug Grant" <dougk1dg@gmail.com>, "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories
From: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Reply-to: K0HB <K0HB@ARRL.ORG>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:55:04 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>
> It would be very interesting if the proliferation of remote and
> robotic Xtreme stations made a difference in the club scores, but I
> doubt it will happen soon.
>

Doug,

I think this new unlimited-unlimited category is a great idea for several 
reasons, but these two come to mind.

1) Most importantly it validates the notion that experimentation and 
stretching the technology is REALLY what amateur radio is all about, and an 
unfettered category like this puts RadioSport firmly into that space.

2) It gives a great counterpoint to the "boy and his radio" enthusiasts 
(like me), providing a playing field whose technology/engineering borders 
include turf all the way from "minimalist" to "extreme".

Good stuff!

73, de Hans, K0HB
http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/
Search my log at http://dx.qsl.net/cgi-bin/logform.cgi?k0hb
 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>