| To: | cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? - Key Clicks |
| From: | Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:04:18 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Dave - AB7E wrote: <snip> > More "slots" means more > opportunity for activity, and narrower receiver bandwidths on the > other end means more likelihood a weaker signal gets heard. I > guarantee that I am able to work FAR more weaker stations with my K3 > than I did with my 756Pro, so I'm not the only one who benefits. I mostly agree, with the following limiting factor: as the slots get narrower, chaos caused by off frequency callers starts reining supreme. -Steve K8LX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?, Marijan Miletic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQ 160 SSB out-of-band operation, VR2BrettGraham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? - Key Clicks, Dave - AB7E |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? - Key Clicks, Doug Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |