How does a CW suffix work, for those who have had a call like that or worked
stations with it? It seems that CW would definitely stand out on CW and has a
nice code rhythm, and Charlie Whiskey seems pretty good on phone. Charlie
Whiskey doesn't sound much like the phonetics for other letters, like the
Alpha/Delta or Papa/Bravo confusions.
73s John AA5JG
--- On Thu, 4/22/10, Rex Lint <rex@lint.mv.com> wrote:
> From: Rex Lint <rex@lint.mv.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters
> To: "'Mike McCarthy, W1NR'" <lists@w1nr.net>
> Cc: dx-is@yahoogroups.com, cq-contest@contesting.com, okdxa@mailman.qth.net
> Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 5:42 PM
> Mike,
>
> I found that any call starting "JULIET THREE" worked pretty
> well...
>
> -Rex-
>
> Rex Lint, Consultant
> 26 Brek Drive
> Merrimack, NH 03054
> PH: 603-860-7651
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Mike McCarthy, W1NR
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:02 AM
> Cc: dx-is@yahoogroups.com;
> cq-contest@contesting.com;
> okdxa@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters
>
> Tom Haavisto wrote:
> > Hi John
> >
> > Just my two cents worth:
> >
> > Don't use Juliet - use Japan.
> > I would use Germany instead of Golf. Longer
> (more syllables, but less
> > confusion)
> >
> This is exactly what should NOT occur, but it has and has
> resulted in
> the confusion we have today. There is a standard set of
> phonetics that
> has been in place for as long as I can remember (at least
> 1960's) and if
> everyone stuck to one standard set then there would not be
> the problems
> we have today. I think they were developed by the military.
> Message
> handlers strictly use one standard set them for a reason.
>
> On CW any callsign with E, I, S, H or 5 is a problem. Take
> the
> following: 5H5/JH1SHV. That is a fistfull and I remember a
> CW contest
> where there was someone using a call from 5H very similar
> to that.
>
> Mike, W1NR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2828 - Release
> Date: 04/22/10
> 02:31:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|