You're doing better than I Art... 39%
But think that may be due to fewer DX stations participating. Some states are
tougher than others on LoTW. I suspect few have any problem with Tennessee any
160-6M mode ;o)
73,
Julius
PS: Anyone needing hard cards and attending Dayton, I'll have cards and logs
with me.
Julius Fazekas
N2WN
Tennessee Contest Group
http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en
Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/
Elecraft K2 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #1875
--- On Fri, 5/7/10, Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW after ARRL DX
> To: "Helmut Mueller" <helmut@photo42.de>
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Date: Friday, May 7, 2010, 7:28 AM
> Hello Helmut,
>
> My ARRL DX CW (~170 QSO only) LoTW confirmation rate is
> about 52%.
>
> RX9TX
>
> Helmut Mueller wrote:
>
> HM> I was working ARRL DX in both modes this year and
> thought I could do
> HM> something for my WAS status.
>
> HM> I had full house on a few bands in both modes and
> more than 6000 Q's
> HM> combined - it was real fun.
>
> HM> Now looking into LotW there is really nothing
> happening! Are US hams not
> HM> using LotW at all?
>
> HM> On the DXCC status - it seems to be all right . but
> I have the feeling that
> HM> less than 5% are using it in the US?
>
> HM> Helmut
> HM> <http://www.df7zs.de> www.df7zs.de
>
> --
> RX9TX
> http://rx9tx.qrz.ru
>
> "I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist
> it." [Mae West]
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|