To: | <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F |
From: | "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:32:20 +0100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message ----- From: <KI9A@aol.com> > I agree 100% with Hans. I see nothing at all "nasty". While it may not be "nasty", it's evident that something there is blatantly unfair. I estimate, and it's probably a conservative estimate, that one spot is worth at least 10 additional QSOs. One WRTC station had 45 spots, whereas 14 or them had a single spot (according to LU5DX's stats). It's not nasty, it's a shame. 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F, Paul O'Kane |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F, KI9A |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F, Radio K0HB |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |