To: | CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Signal reports in IARU R1 V/U/SHF contest |
From: | Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:41:35 +0200 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I know the signal report discussion is always activating a lot of people. PI4Z did make some qso's on 24GHz during IARU Region 1 May contest. In one of the qso's the other station did not write down the sent report properly. The qso was removed. We had a recording, the station was really sending 529 and not 519 (which was in the log). Should this qso being removed? 73 Henk PA5KT -- Henk Remijn PA5KT email: pa5kt@remijn.net www: www.pa5kt.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] no no no...it MUST be 579 (was 599), Henk Remijn PA5KT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] no no no...it MUST be 579 (was 599), HK3CW |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Age related problems in FT1000?, John Geiger |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] State of the email list (reflector), km9m-zig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |