| To: | Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it.... |
| From: | George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:42:44 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
The mults for the naqp are states. I don't think Campbell, CA is a separate state from CA. -- George Fremin III On Dec 24, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com> wrote: > And make Campbell, CA a mult also. I'd really like to be on the "chased" side > of things for a change... > > Jack Brindle, W6FB > > > On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote: > >> Good choice. While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a >> multiplier? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules, Radio K0HB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules, HK3CW |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it...., Jack Brindle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it...., Robert Chudek - K0RC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |