| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? |
| From: | Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | n2ic@arrl.net |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:00:03 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 03/18/2011 03:33 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote: > On 17/03/2011 20:55, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: > >> A friend who asks to remain anonymous suggests the following -- one CW >> Skimmer operator on each continent should dedicate his or her receiver >> for the 24 hours of the Russian DX contest to monitoring one band, and >> record as much of the entire bandwidth as possible. > > That would work. No it wouldn't. You mostly-CW guys are forgetting that the RDXC is a multi-mode contest - CW and SSB. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?, burbidge terence |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2011 NA Sprint RTTY - March - Final 3830 Claimed Scores, n7wa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?, Paul O'Kane |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?, burbidge terence |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |