| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Clock Hour vs QRate Hour |
| From: | Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-to: | Mike Tessmer <k9nw@qth.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:36:21 -0400 (GMT-04:00) |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> clock hour vs Qrate-hour There seems to be a perception that one of these is, in some way, more "pure" than the other. Why? What's the difference if you have a 400 hour from 0000z to 0059z, or a 400 hour from 0003z to 0102z? You still worked 400 guys in an hour, right? Idle curiosity.... 73, Mike K9NW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] End of contest and rewriting log, Radio K0HB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CAC ..... was "radio-sport.net web site or, copy and paste journalism, Phillip |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2011 CQ WW RTTY - Non-USA 3830 Claimed Scores 30Sep2011, n7wa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Clock Hour vs QRate Hour, Juan Hidalgo EA8CAC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |