CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:25:39 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
How will the sponsors know if they did or not? unless someone turns them 
in.  Then of course whats to stop someone from then saying they did not 
when they did just to get them penalized.  I can't see it being good 
either way.

It's the honor system I guess.

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 11/7/2011 10:58 AM, Georgek5kg@aol.com wrote:
> I am throwing this out there for comment.
>
> In SS, I worked a number of ops who did not send their callsign  as part of
> the exchange.  I found this to be very frustrating  for several reasons,
> namely (1) sending the callsign as part of the  "required exchange" is
> specified in the SS rules, (2) it breaks  the rhythm when copying the 
> exchange, and
> finally (3) it gives the op an  advantage by not taking time to send his
> callsign.
>
> Question: Should there be a penalty for not sending the callsign as part of
>   the required exchange?
>
> 73, George, K5KG
>
> George  Wagner, K5KG
> Sarasota, FL
> 941-400-1960  cell
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>