CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The importance of CHECKLOGS

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The importance of CHECKLOGS
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:45:52 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm all for checklogs, but it seems to me that removing legitimate 
contacts simply because a casual participant didn't send in his log is a 
policy problem, not a procedural one.   I for one would question whether 
that really represents an advancement in the state of log checking 
standards.

Dave   AB7E



On 11/21/2011 9:15 AM, Marc - ON7SS - OO9O wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Every year again we have to remove QSO's from a contestlog because the
> callsign is not traceable.
>
> We all know that some people mainly non-contesters just make a few
> QSO's, or to work a new country, a new prefix or to give a friend a few
> points.
> What they don't realize, not being a contester, is that logchecking is
> growing to such standards that QSO's like that face the possibility to
> be removed from the log.
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>