To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs |
From: | "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:19:31 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
The reason I believe it is acceptable to work them and not log them is because if you run out of patience in waiting for them to sign, then you honestly don't know what to log. I believe its no different than the exchange attempt as follows: Me: N1UR You; N1UR? 599 15 Me: 599 5 You: N1UR? CFM? Me: N1UR You (not hearing me): NIL In this instance example: DX: dit dit Me: N1UR DX N1UR 599 33 Me: 599 5 CL? DX: dit dit Me CL? DX works 4 more stations without signing Me: NIL Tell me what's wrong with that. Ed _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] no call - no exchange!, nick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW, rin JG1VGX |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs, Jukka Klemola |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] W7DRA 160QRP CQWW debriefing, w7dra |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |