| To: | CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio |
| From: | "Yannick (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:39:24 +0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Hi, This is bit out of topic but contesters opinion is highly valuable. Following a discussion on DX-World.net about the next Intrepid-DX group QSL policy I started a small poll about QSL in the 21th century in general. Please share your opinion. http://www.qslwatch.com/poll-about-qsl-bureau/ Thanks. 73, Yan. --- Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/ http://varc.radioclub.asia/ http://www.qslwatch.com/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NCCC RTTY SPRINT - Friday, March 30, 0130Z UTC, Tom Hutton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio, Bill Parry |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] NCCC RTTY SPRINT - Friday, March 30, 0130Z UTC, Tom Hutton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio, Bill Parry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |