a published list of cheaters... prior to closing the acceptance of logs...
would allow the removal of their qsos...and THAT would work!!!That would get me
a WHOLE lot more interested in working the big contests.... good idea Doug
and thanks Jim.. bet there are a bunch more to tell too.
--... ...--
Dale - WC7S in Wy
> It would be a wonderful thing if "the cheaters" would be rewarded with an
> on-the-air, during
> the contest, boycott; nobody work them.
>
> I don't know why this concept has not been discussed before (maybe it has,
> but I missed it).
>
> Forget peer pressure or public humiliation (of which NEITHER works on
> die-hard cheaters). Just
> boycott their signal. Nobody boycotting them is going to "lose" because of 1
> QSO/1 mult (and
> it is likely that they won't be a unique mult either), per band.
>
> Or maybe some "civil disobedience" -go ahead and work them, then remove them
> from your
> log after the contest. No QSO is "only" 0 points. A NIL means lost QSO +
> PENALTY.
>
> Perhaps it's time to think out of the box for life-long cheaters; but you
> didn't hear it from me.
>
> ;-)
>
> de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|