| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Too Much 'Assistance'? |
| From: | Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:20:19 +0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 20/02/2014 09:18, Tony Brock-Fisher wrote: In this weekend's CW contest, Skimmer and the telnet cluster were functioning at peak efficiency. Here is my summary of the issues raised by K1KP - 1. Is it appropriate, in a ham-radio contest, to use public communications utilities for the purpose of increasing your score? 2. Is it appropriate, in a CW contest, to use CW decoders? 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Too Much 'Assistance'?, Pete Smith N4ZR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Too Much 'Assistance'?, Tony Brock-Fisher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Too Much 'Assistance'?, Pete Smith N4ZR |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Too Much 'Assistance'?, Tony Brock-Fisher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |