| To: | Rex Maner <k7qq@netzero.net>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right? |
| From: | Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:12:59 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I figure that if you know the other guy hasn't got it right.. it isn't a Q...
IF you don't KNOW he doesn't have it right.. and he "QSLs".. you gotta assume
he has it right.. therefore the "busted calls"... Deleting one that is wrong..
isn't a problem is it? NOT deleting one wouldbe wrong if you KNOW it isn't a
Q...
Guess I'm stuck in the 60's... huh?
Have a great day,
--... ...--
Dale - WC7S in Wy
> From: k7qq@netzero.net
> To: W5OV@W5OV.COM; ww1me@roadrunner.com; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:09:50 +0000
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right?
>
> Big Question
>
> Do I have a valid contact if I know the information passed (NOT passed ) was
> incorrect ??
>
> Rex K7QQ
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ160ssb report, Jeff Blaine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right?, Radio K0HB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right?, Rex Maner |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CWO vs NAS, Hal Offutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |